101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: Lessons learned with our early experience

Nicholas T. Haddock, Andrew Gassman, Min Jeong Cho, Sumeet S. Teotia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Free and local flaps based on the profunda artery perforators were first used for reconstruction of pressure sores, burn contractures, and extremity wounds. Recently, a revised profunda artery perforator flap was introduced for breast reconstruction. However, despite increasing reports of the use of the flap, it remains a rarely used option. The authors present their early experience with the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps used for breast reconstruction at their institution. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps at their institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: One hundred one consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps were used to reconstruct 96 breasts in 56 patients. In 42 breasts, the flap was used in conjunction with another flap - with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (n = 36), a superior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 1), or as stacked profunda artery perforator flaps (n = 5). Mean flap weight was 425 g (range, 170 to 815 g), and mean patient body mass index was 26.8 kg/m2 (range, 18.2 to 42.3 kg/m2). Complications included total flap loss (2 percent), donor-site cellulitis (5.9 percent), and donor-site wound dehiscence (10.9 percent). Conclusions: The profunda artery perforator flap is a safe and reliable option for breast reconstruction. Flap size is adequate for breast reconstruction in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, it can be combined with other flaps when additional volume or skin requirements are present. Flap and donor-site complications are comparable to those of other free tissue breast reconstruction options. It is a clear second option to the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous tissue reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-239
Number of pages11
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume140
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Perforator Flap
Mammaplasty
Arteries
Breast
Wounds and Injuries
Cellulitis
Free Tissue Flaps
Pressure Ulcer
Contracture
Body Mass Index
Extremities
Demography
Skin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction : Lessons learned with our early experience. / Haddock, Nicholas T.; Gassman, Andrew; Cho, Min Jeong; Teotia, Sumeet S.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 140, No. 2, 01.08.2017, p. 229-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haddock, Nicholas T.; Gassman, Andrew; Cho, Min Jeong; Teotia, Sumeet S. / 101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction : Lessons learned with our early experience.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 140, No. 2, 01.08.2017, p. 229-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{692a9d458a93482a97adce69f7170a77,
title = "101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: Lessons learned with our early experience",
abstract = "Background: Free and local flaps based on the profunda artery perforators were first used for reconstruction of pressure sores, burn contractures, and extremity wounds. Recently, a revised profunda artery perforator flap was introduced for breast reconstruction. However, despite increasing reports of the use of the flap, it remains a rarely used option. The authors present their early experience with the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps used for breast reconstruction at their institution. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps at their institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: One hundred one consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps were used to reconstruct 96 breasts in 56 patients. In 42 breasts, the flap was used in conjunction with another flap - with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (n = 36), a superior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 1), or as stacked profunda artery perforator flaps (n = 5). Mean flap weight was 425 g (range, 170 to 815 g), and mean patient body mass index was 26.8 kg/m2 (range, 18.2 to 42.3 kg/m2). Complications included total flap loss (2 percent), donor-site cellulitis (5.9 percent), and donor-site wound dehiscence (10.9 percent). Conclusions: The profunda artery perforator flap is a safe and reliable option for breast reconstruction. Flap size is adequate for breast reconstruction in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, it can be combined with other flaps when additional volume or skin requirements are present. Flap and donor-site complications are comparable to those of other free tissue breast reconstruction options. It is a clear second option to the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous tissue reconstruction.",
author = "Haddock, {Nicholas T.} and Andrew Gassman and Cho, {Min Jeong} and Teotia, {Sumeet S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000003553",
volume = "140",
pages = "229--239",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction

T2 - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

AU - Haddock,Nicholas T.

AU - Gassman,Andrew

AU - Cho,Min Jeong

AU - Teotia,Sumeet S.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background: Free and local flaps based on the profunda artery perforators were first used for reconstruction of pressure sores, burn contractures, and extremity wounds. Recently, a revised profunda artery perforator flap was introduced for breast reconstruction. However, despite increasing reports of the use of the flap, it remains a rarely used option. The authors present their early experience with the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps used for breast reconstruction at their institution. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps at their institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: One hundred one consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps were used to reconstruct 96 breasts in 56 patients. In 42 breasts, the flap was used in conjunction with another flap - with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (n = 36), a superior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 1), or as stacked profunda artery perforator flaps (n = 5). Mean flap weight was 425 g (range, 170 to 815 g), and mean patient body mass index was 26.8 kg/m2 (range, 18.2 to 42.3 kg/m2). Complications included total flap loss (2 percent), donor-site cellulitis (5.9 percent), and donor-site wound dehiscence (10.9 percent). Conclusions: The profunda artery perforator flap is a safe and reliable option for breast reconstruction. Flap size is adequate for breast reconstruction in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, it can be combined with other flaps when additional volume or skin requirements are present. Flap and donor-site complications are comparable to those of other free tissue breast reconstruction options. It is a clear second option to the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous tissue reconstruction.

AB - Background: Free and local flaps based on the profunda artery perforators were first used for reconstruction of pressure sores, burn contractures, and extremity wounds. Recently, a revised profunda artery perforator flap was introduced for breast reconstruction. However, despite increasing reports of the use of the flap, it remains a rarely used option. The authors present their early experience with the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps used for breast reconstruction at their institution. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the first 101 profunda artery perforator flaps at their institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: One hundred one consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps were used to reconstruct 96 breasts in 56 patients. In 42 breasts, the flap was used in conjunction with another flap - with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (n = 36), a superior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 1), or as stacked profunda artery perforator flaps (n = 5). Mean flap weight was 425 g (range, 170 to 815 g), and mean patient body mass index was 26.8 kg/m2 (range, 18.2 to 42.3 kg/m2). Complications included total flap loss (2 percent), donor-site cellulitis (5.9 percent), and donor-site wound dehiscence (10.9 percent). Conclusions: The profunda artery perforator flap is a safe and reliable option for breast reconstruction. Flap size is adequate for breast reconstruction in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, it can be combined with other flaps when additional volume or skin requirements are present. Flap and donor-site complications are comparable to those of other free tissue breast reconstruction options. It is a clear second option to the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous tissue reconstruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026316614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026316614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003553

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003553

M3 - Article

VL - 140

SP - 229

EP - 239

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 2

ER -