Discriminating between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Anemia of Chronic Disease Using Traditional Indices of Iron Status vs Transferrin Receptor Concentration

Frank H. Wians, Jill E. Urban, Joseph H. Keffer, Steven H. Kroft

  • 63 Citations

Abstract

We compared the ability of soluble serum transferrin receptor (TfR) concentration, quantified using the R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) enzyme-linked immunosorbent TfR assay, with other, more traditional indicators of iron status (total iron binding capacity [TIBC], mean corpuscular volume [MCV], percent transferrin saturation [%TS], RBC distribution width [RDW], and serum iron concentration [SIC]) for discriminating between patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) or anemia of chronic disease (ACD). The TfR concentration was determined in 72 serum samples selected from men and nonpregnant women classified biochemically on the basis of ferritin concentration as having IDA (n = 41) or ACD (n = 31). By using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of the various indicators of iron status that we evaluated for discriminating between IDA and ACD decreased in the following order: TIBC > TfR > MCV > (%TS = RDW) > SIC. There was no significant difference between the diagnostic accuracy of TIBC and TfR. Thus, the routine measurement of TfR offers no advantage over TIBC for discriminating between people with biochemically defined IDA or ACD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-118
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Volume115
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2001

Fingerprint

Transferrin Receptors
Iron-Deficiency Anemias
Anemia
Chronic Disease
Iron
Serum
Erythrocyte Indices
Immunosorbents
Transferrin
Ferritins
ROC Curve
Enzymes

Keywords

  • Anemia of chronic disease
  • Ferritin
  • Iron deficiency anemia
  • Iron studies
  • Receiver operating characteristic curve
  • Transferrin receptor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Discriminating between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Anemia of Chronic Disease Using Traditional Indices of Iron Status vs Transferrin Receptor Concentration. / Wians, Frank H.; Urban, Jill E.; Keffer, Joseph H.; Kroft, Steven H.

In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 115, No. 1, 01.2001, p. 112-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wians, Frank H.; Urban, Jill E.; Keffer, Joseph H.; Kroft, Steven H. / Discriminating between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Anemia of Chronic Disease Using Traditional Indices of Iron Status vs Transferrin Receptor Concentration.

In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 115, No. 1, 01.2001, p. 112-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{559180322337418ba233408bb673101b,
title = "Discriminating between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Anemia of Chronic Disease Using Traditional Indices of Iron Status vs Transferrin Receptor Concentration",
abstract = "We compared the ability of soluble serum transferrin receptor (TfR) concentration, quantified using the R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) enzyme-linked immunosorbent TfR assay, with other, more traditional indicators of iron status (total iron binding capacity [TIBC], mean corpuscular volume [MCV], percent transferrin saturation [%TS], RBC distribution width [RDW], and serum iron concentration [SIC]) for discriminating between patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) or anemia of chronic disease (ACD). The TfR concentration was determined in 72 serum samples selected from men and nonpregnant women classified biochemically on the basis of ferritin concentration as having IDA (n = 41) or ACD (n = 31). By using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of the various indicators of iron status that we evaluated for discriminating between IDA and ACD decreased in the following order: TIBC > TfR > MCV > (%TS = RDW) > SIC. There was no significant difference between the diagnostic accuracy of TIBC and TfR. Thus, the routine measurement of TfR offers no advantage over TIBC for discriminating between people with biochemically defined IDA or ACD.",
keywords = "Anemia of chronic disease, Ferritin, Iron deficiency anemia, Iron studies, Receiver operating characteristic curve, Transferrin receptor",
author = "Wians, {Frank H.} and Urban, {Jill E.} and Keffer, {Joseph H.} and Kroft, {Steven H.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1309/6L34-V3AR-DW39-DH30",
volume = "115",
pages = "112--118",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discriminating between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Anemia of Chronic Disease Using Traditional Indices of Iron Status vs Transferrin Receptor Concentration

AU - Wians,Frank H.

AU - Urban,Jill E.

AU - Keffer,Joseph H.

AU - Kroft,Steven H.

PY - 2001/1

Y1 - 2001/1

N2 - We compared the ability of soluble serum transferrin receptor (TfR) concentration, quantified using the R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) enzyme-linked immunosorbent TfR assay, with other, more traditional indicators of iron status (total iron binding capacity [TIBC], mean corpuscular volume [MCV], percent transferrin saturation [%TS], RBC distribution width [RDW], and serum iron concentration [SIC]) for discriminating between patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) or anemia of chronic disease (ACD). The TfR concentration was determined in 72 serum samples selected from men and nonpregnant women classified biochemically on the basis of ferritin concentration as having IDA (n = 41) or ACD (n = 31). By using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of the various indicators of iron status that we evaluated for discriminating between IDA and ACD decreased in the following order: TIBC > TfR > MCV > (%TS = RDW) > SIC. There was no significant difference between the diagnostic accuracy of TIBC and TfR. Thus, the routine measurement of TfR offers no advantage over TIBC for discriminating between people with biochemically defined IDA or ACD.

AB - We compared the ability of soluble serum transferrin receptor (TfR) concentration, quantified using the R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) enzyme-linked immunosorbent TfR assay, with other, more traditional indicators of iron status (total iron binding capacity [TIBC], mean corpuscular volume [MCV], percent transferrin saturation [%TS], RBC distribution width [RDW], and serum iron concentration [SIC]) for discriminating between patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) or anemia of chronic disease (ACD). The TfR concentration was determined in 72 serum samples selected from men and nonpregnant women classified biochemically on the basis of ferritin concentration as having IDA (n = 41) or ACD (n = 31). By using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of the various indicators of iron status that we evaluated for discriminating between IDA and ACD decreased in the following order: TIBC > TfR > MCV > (%TS = RDW) > SIC. There was no significant difference between the diagnostic accuracy of TIBC and TfR. Thus, the routine measurement of TfR offers no advantage over TIBC for discriminating between people with biochemically defined IDA or ACD.

KW - Anemia of chronic disease

KW - Ferritin

KW - Iron deficiency anemia

KW - Iron studies

KW - Receiver operating characteristic curve

KW - Transferrin receptor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035220962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035220962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1309/6L34-V3AR-DW39-DH30

DO - 10.1309/6L34-V3AR-DW39-DH30

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 112

EP - 118

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

T2 - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

IS - 1

ER -